home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: cs.vu.nl!sun4nl!xs4all!noblehouse!Ronald
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- From: Ronald@noblehouse.xs4all.nl (Ronald van Eijck)
- Subject: Re: MUI 3.2 vs. BGUI
- References: <bmaple.ifus@burner.com> <BBA46D81@cu-amiga.demon.co.uk>
- X-NewsSoftware: GRn 2.1 Feb 19, 1994
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Message-ID: <Ronald.06uh@noblehouse.xs4all.nl>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 96 09:48:14 CET
- Organization: R&R Software
-
-
- In article <BBA46D81@cu-amiga.demon.co.uk> Mat Bettinson <mat@cu-amiga.demon.co.uk> writes:
- >
- > If you don't like some software on the Amiga, why not simply delete it and
- > not use it? Why go on a holy war to convince everyone else of it's pure
- > evilness. I mean there's no MCP vs MCX wars (very simular arguments could be
- > applied) so why this? JUST because you are alledgedly FORCED to use the GUI
- > system because certain software that's the only one of it's kind requres it,
- > doesn't give you a right to slag it off. The Amiga needs every developer and
- > every enhancement package it can get. Accept that people like MUI and accept
- > that some programs would not BE without MUI even if you HATE it. Then leave
- > it. Please. I BEG YOU.
-
- I'd like to add something to the above. Don't flame software authors for using
- the gui package of their choice. If someone writes PD/Shareware software and
- he/she does not want to count pixels or spend time doing a fontsensitive gadtools
- program thats the choice of the author. Even if its just 2 string gadgets. Always
- keep in mind that the alternative is probably that the program would not have
- been written.
-
- C'ya,
-
- --
- * Ronald van Eijck
- *
- * If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear
- * the result of a hundred battles. (Sun Tzu)
-